We hope that the answers provided help to make the acquisition process clearer.
The answers provided below are the opinions of Leslie James Acquisitions.
Their accuracy is not warranted and vendors and acquirers are advised to take independent professional advice on the issues discussed.
Leslie James Acquisitions can accept no liability for the opinions expressed.
Of course, there’s no “one size fits all” answer to that question.
Valuation depends on a variety of factors, not least profitability, USP and growth potential but also on other acquirer appetite related factors such as a niche or specialisation, synergy, geography, market share etc.
There is however a good guide to valuation based on current market conditions and that is to calculate EBITDA and apply a multiple to the end figure.
In the context of insurance businesses, EBITDA is essentially a simple calculation.
It is to take the current operating profit (earnings less operating expenses) and then to “add back” non-essential post acquisition expenses, the likes of:
- The salaries and benefits of departing Directors.
- Lifestyle expenses associated with the Directors.
- Office costs (if the business is to be amalgamated within the acquirer’s offices)
- Duplicated resources, possibly including Finance, Compliance etc.
The then increased profit figure is known as the “Adjusted Profit” and it is this figure to which acquirers will apply a multiple to arrive at a valuation and offer for the business.
Profitable, attractive insurance businesses are currently being acquired for around 7 to 8 times EBITDA/Adjusted Profit and sometimes up to 10 times or even more depending on synergies and the acquirer’s appetite.
In terms of multiples of earnings (commission and fee income), subject again to profitability and the other factors mentioned, a good, profitable business will be valued at up to 2.5 to 3 times earnings and for particularly attractive businesses, this could go higher, even to 3.75 times or more.
We act exclusively for insurance brokers, PMI brokers, MGAs and IFAs.
Many businesses accumulate cash on their balance sheets.
Some of this will be necessary working capital but beyond that, there may be cash surpluses and these cash surpluses will need to be removed from the business, before or at the point of sale.
There are a number of options which vendors will want to explore and it is very important to take professional financial advice.
The options can include:
1. Asking the acquirer to purchase the cash, at par, i.e. pound for pound, with the vendor using that cash to fund the acquisition. This is likely
to be the most tax effective option for the vendor but it is not something that all acquirers will agree to.
2. Taking the cash as dividends. There is of course a limit to how much cash can be taken as dividends – the amount can’t exceed profits – and of course, there is a fairly weighty tax to pay.
3. Investing the cash into a pension scheme and taking subsequent drawdowns. HMRC approval is required for this and again, there are taxes to pay on drawdown.
4. Investing / transferring the cash as a loan into a newly created company. Again, this is subject to HMRC approval.
Whichever route you as a vendor decide upon, you will need to take professional advice from an accountant etc.
The simple answer is yes, this is highly likely.
With an earnout, an acquirer places an initial value on the business (the “EV” or “Enterprise Value”).
When that valuation is agreed between the vendor and the acquirer, the acquirer issues Heads of Terms to set out the agreed purchase and when that is signed by both parties, the acquirer proceeds to “due diligence”, which when complete, results in a Sale/Purchase agreement being settled.
In an earnout situation, the acquirer agrees to pay, on Completion (the signing of the Sale/Purchase agreement) an initial lump sum, which is usually around 60% (sometimes up to 80%) of the Enterprise Value. Beyond that, the acquirer normally agrees to pay the balance over 12 or 24 months.
In an earnout arrangement, if there is growth within the earnout period, this will usually be reflected in enhanced payments to the vendor. Of course, that works both ways, in that if business is lost, the balance payments will reduce. However, in the case of most broking businesses for example, typically experiencing annual retention rates of 90%-95% and growth by way of new business, reduced earnout payments become unlikely.
Also, most vendors will “average out” so that if there is a drop in business in the first year post acquisition but this is made up in the second year, the value of the 40% balance payment will not reduce.
When you sell your business, you will be faced with two options, although the acquirer will normally have a fairly fixed idea of how they want the sale to be structured.
Most sales are undertaken by way of a sale of shares where the acquirer takes the company and its business, lock, stock and barrel, assuming both its assets and its liabilities.
In some cases however, particularly where a vendor is only looking to sell part of its business, for example one of its books of business, the transaction will be undertaken as a goodwill or asset sale (known as a BPA).
This is a complex area where, dependent on the structure of the sale, potential liabilities will crystallise for the vendor by way of Capital Gains Tax and/or Corporation Tax and/or Stamp Duty etc. Some of these liabilities may be mitigated with advantage taken of Entrepreneur’s Relief (now known as Business Asset Disposal Relief) where, subject to limits (currently £1 million), the vendor will only pay Capital Gains Tax at a reduced rate of 10% on the proceeds.
There are advantages and disadvantages of both approaches and before a vendor makes any decisions, appropriate professional advice will need to be taken and in addition to taxation issues, consideration will also need to be given to the rights of existing employees under the provisions of TUPE (The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006) (and amendments).